04 June 2013

How to and why block Linkedin access to your organization

This comes from Adam Fowler from www.adamfowlerit.com
Some more indepth view and testing was done by Paul Cunningham from www.exchangeserverpro.com

Recently Linkedin added a new feature to their site.
It gives you the abillity to search for contacts on your company address book.



















How handy that may seem, the other side of this is that Linkedin is given your login credentials to the corporate Exchange environment.
I case of a security breach or hack over at our friends at Linkedin, your username, password, email address and webmail url are in the wrong hands posing a serious security issue.

So, here's how to stop Linkedin from accessing your Exchange servers:

First, under the Set-OrganizationConfig area, you'll need to check that EwsApplicationAccessPolicy is set to 'EnforceBlockList'

[PS] C:\Windows\system32>Get-OrganizationConfig | fl ews*

EwsEnabled                 :
EwsAllowOutlook            :
EwsAllowMacOutlook         :
EwsAllowEntourage          :
EwsApplicationAccessPolicy :

EwsAllowList               :
EwsBlockList               :


If it shows up empty like above, you have to enable the blocklist.

[PS] C:\Windows\system32>Set-OrganizationConfig -EwsApplicationAccessPolicy enforceblocklist
[PS] C:\Windows\system32>


Next, you need to add LinkedIn into the BlockList.

[PS] C:\Windows\system32>Set-OrganizationConfig -EwsBlockList LinkedInEWS

Lets see how that looks.

[PS] C:\Windows\system32>Get-OrganizationConfig | fl ews*

EwsEnabled                 :
EwsAllowOutlook            :
EwsAllowMacOutlook         :
EwsAllowEntourage          :
EwsApplicationAccessPolicy : EnforceBlockList
EwsAllowList               :
EwsBlockList               : {LinkedInEWS}



Adam Fowler's source
Paul Cunninham's source

2 comments:

  1. Hello,

    This solution doesn't seem te be working.
    Do I need to restart some services?

    Regards,

    Ron

    ReplyDelete
  2. Is it in Exchange 2010? For 2007 it seems to be a bit different.

    ReplyDelete